Kanisha D. Bond, Milli Lake, and Sarah E. Parkinson offer four lessons from conflict research for the “Covid-19 and the Social Sciences” series. Based on their own extensive backgrounds conducting fieldwork in insecure places, the authors outline several points for researchers newly grappling with pandemic-induced insecurity: that crisis heightens conditions of vulnerability and inequality, that fieldwork is perpetually fraught, that researchers must demonstrate restraint, and that empathy is key. Keeping these lessons in mind, they argue, will help researchers to center the concerns of those at the margins and produce research that is both methodologically and ethically sound.
Sarah E. Parkinson
Sarah E. Parkinson is the Aronson Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Johns Hopkins University. Grounded by social network theory and ethnographic methodologies, her research examines organizational behavior and social change in war- and disaster-affected settings, with a focus on the Middle East and North Africa. Parkinson has conducted extensive fieldwork in Lebanon and Iraq. She has published research on militant organizations’ decision-making and internal dynamics, political violence, forced migration, ethics, and research methods. Her scholarship can be found in the American Political Science Review, Perspectives on Politics, the European Journal of International Relations, Social Science and Medicine, Comparative Politics, Middle East Report, and PS: Political Science and Politics in addition to outlets such as Foreign Policy and the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage. Parkinson is also a cofounder of the Advancing Research on Conflict (ARC) Consortium. She received her PhD and MA in political science from the University of Chicago and has held fellowships at Yale University, George Washington University, and the University of Minnesota. Follow her on Twitter @se_parkinson.
Latest posts
Democracy and Pandemics
Acting “as if” during Pandemic: Information and Authoritarian Practice in White House
by Sarah E. ParkinsonIn this essay for the “Covid-19 and the Social Sciences” series, Sarah Parkinson examines authoritarian practices at work in White House press briefings regarding Covid-19 in the United States. She argues that the briefings can serve as a barometer of the state of US democracy at the same time that they actively erode democratic norms and institutions. She finds that there are three ways in which the briefings challenge democracy: prompting obedience without belief, establishing guidelines for speech and behavior, and overwhelming the attention of the media.
June 25, 2020