While congressional conflict is most visible when the institution is debating a bill or nomination, the roots of conflict arise earlier in the legislative process. When the House and Senate debate legislation, two of the institution’s most important decisions—whether to make policy and how—already have been made at the committee level. In this essay, Jonathan Lewallen explores agreement and dissent in congressional committees. Drawing on committee reports, he finds that, although overall rates of disagreement on committee reports have not changed much since the mid-1990s, there is variation in the likelihood of report disagreements by committee. This project is poised to better understand where and why agreement in Congress has become harder.
Jonathan Lewallen
Jonathan Lewallen is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Tampa. His research focuses on agenda setting and public policy in the US Congress, including what issues the institution pays attention to and how legislators address those issues. Lewallen’s first book, Committees and the Decline of Lawmaking in Congress, will be published in 2020 by the University of Michigan Press. Lewallen received a Social Science Research Council Negotiating Agreement in Congress research grant in 2017–2018 for his project, “Turnover, Agreement, and Dissent in Congressional Committees.”